BLIND GOSSIP

The #1 Blind Item Site in the World!

Pregnancy Story 2

[Blind Gossip] This actress likes to tell people how much she wants to live a private life.

Now, we could debate all day long the fact that the kind of life she chose doesn’t exactly lend itself towards privacy.

In fact, both her career and her choice of partner pretty much ensure that her life will never really be private.

That’s why it is so interesting that she was able to maintain some measure of secrecy around having a baby in the past year.

We have something to tell you about that.

While she now has the baby, she didn’t exactly have the baby.

There was a surrogate!

Given that our actress likes to advocate for a healthy lifestyle – and has been known to talk about her workouts and diet – why didn’t she have the baby herself?

She’s had a health issue for a few years now. Actually, more than one health issue, but the one that made it unsafe for her to to through the pregnancy herself is her dependency on prescription medication.

We will not disagree that the girl has issues. However, wouldn’t it have made more sense for  her to resolve that medication issue before “having” the baby?

It was a timing thing. She wanted the baby now and she wanted it to be healthy so this was the best option. She can deal with that other issue later.

Similar: Country Baby On The Way

Actress:

[Optional] Do you think she is a good mother?

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Schadenfreuding says

    100% Meghan Markle. She’s been known to bore everyone to tears with her ‘healthy’ diet and yoga bleatings, famously demands privacy yet married a Prince, aired her dirty laundry to Oprah and a global TV audience and has PR floozies dumping in the media daily about her magnificence. She was noticeably low key this go round of moonbump #2 for fear of scrutiny. The woman in the pic is wearing a royal blue dress and conspicuously holding bump, MeMe style. Malignant narcs rarely make good parents.

  2. momoftwo2015 says

    This is Jessica Biel. She wanted a baby now to distract from JT’s cheating scandal and the fact that he had to cancel tour dates to address family issues ie her addiction. I hope that she gets the help that she needs. Cheating JT as a husband probably doesn’t help.

  3. MLBfan says

    Alicia Vikander. IDK about her parenting skills; is she intending for Fassbender to do the heavy lifting of parenting while she’s high and out of it? Does she think a baby is like a kitten or something?

  4. bamagirl1980 says

    It’s Jessica Biel. It’s pretty well known that she has a bad dependency on prescription pills. At least she cared enough to have a surrogate carry the baby so she would have a healthy baby. The timing issue was, the baby came a little more than 9 months after the debacle in New Orleans where Justin was photographed with his costar getting all lovey dovey , so Jessica wanted that baby fast to prove they were still a family. I wish them well.

  5. peppermint twist says

    Sounds like * markle. I think she carried Archie, you could tell by the chubbiness of her face she was pregnant the first time. It wouldn’t surprise me if she didn’t carry the second child, her personality would suggest she wouldn’t have what it takes to make the sacrifices needed to have a baby, now she knows what those sacrifices entail. As for her court jester of a husband juggling outside the window, he looked like even more of a clown than usual. Those two are pathetic fame *…

  6. ginafair says

    MM…is she a good mom? Well, she is a horrible wife, daughter, sister, sister in law, friend, actress, etc. Does she do anything well? She loves herself too much to be a good mom. Being a good mom means being a good person. Unselfish…which is a requirement for good parenting…is not a trait that MM has exhibited. Poor Archie and Lilibet. And poor PH! It was HER idea that he stand outside and juggle while she spoke to MM…making him look like a court jester fool. What a selfish *

    • Alexis_Rose says

      That juggling bit was so weird. My guess is Jessica Biel because she had such a “top secret” pregnancy.

  7. ItsBouquet says

    After re-reading the blind, my first guess (Amber Heard) doesn’t make sense. Amber never hid the fact that she didn’t carry the baby. I applaud her for that, there’s no shame in surrogacy.

    The obvious choice seems to be Markle but as awful as she is, you can see her body changes with each pregnancy. Her waist disappeared both times and her face got fuller.

    I can’t wait to find out who this is

    • HistFicAuthor says

      Unless she purposely put on weight to make it look real, I honestly don’t think she used a surrogate. Her face was much fuller than normal for several months after Archie’s birth and her body shape changed completely – she lost her waist and was much hippier for a long time. I’m no MM fan, but I think it’s pretty obvious it was a real pregnancy. Can’t say the same for the second one though.

    • Lady In Red says

      I believe this is MM and both her pregnancies were surrogate.
      Hormones to produce lactation cause weight gain and bloating, a convenient side effect. All her relationships prove being a good mother will not be on her radar.

  10. lila8245 says

    My first thought was Meghan Markle (currently the most hypocritical, pontificating, smug, self-congratulating, and annoying celebrity on earth IMO) but this is Alicia Vikander, seen toting a baby around the airport with her husband. Vikander was addicted to painkillers when she was younger.

  12. DDCASK says

    Thought this was Markle but then remembered a blind about Alicia Vikander and the possible use or over use of pain meds. Don’t recall her talking about a healthy lifestyle, but I miss a lot of things!

    Alicia Vikander has been snapped with her cute baby at a French airport, thought she looked in great shape for a new mom but having a surrogate would explain it!

    If it’s her, hope she gets the help she needs so she can have a wonderful experience with her child.

  19. kit e kat says

    Although most folks will say it’s Princess Meghan… it’s actually Hilaria Baldwin, who’s trying to explain away the difference in her youngest children’s ages.

    • OhYeah says

      That doesn’t really add up, though, because she was actually pregnant with the first baby while she was using a surrogate for the girl. I think she’s just trying to play coy about it so she can get more headlines and media attention, because it’s obvious they used a surrogate.

    • Stefanie2530 says

      And HILARY isn’t an actress. Well, except for pretending she’s Spanish. Hilary never tries to keep her life private either. Can’t be Hilary Baldwin

  21. theamusedonlooker says

    If this is Meghan, that’s surprising! I would’ve thought she would make sure that the children have clear royal blood.
    Optional: yes, I think she’s a good mom. I disagree with every one of her life choices so far, but I do think she’s a good mom.

  25. aaaStorm says

    Markle

    I have no idea if she is a good mother; she is a horrible daughter, sister, etc.

    • olderwiser64 says

      Great observation. I’m pretty sure she’s a malignant narcissist so one child will be the golden child (my guess is Archie) and the other will be the scapegoat (Lili since she’s a girl and by that very fact she’s a threat to Meg). Meg does not get along well with women & girls she has power over. Her children are props and her husbands job is to worship her like the sun. They must all orbit around her.

  26. HarlowB says

    Actress:. Amber Heard

    I think she will be a terrible mother and a nanny will raise that child

  29. Abstermcdaddyo says

    Is this meghan markle?

    I honestly couldn’t say if she’s a good or bad parent, keeps them out of the spotlight at least and is not dangling them as a carrot for payperview (might change if other endeavours come off)

  33. GretaGuesses says

    Harry’s wife

    Narcissists don’t generally make good mothers. Do we have any proof that this couple has any children actually living with them?

    • Searon says

      I truly believe if it was within her power 2 make money from her children she would. There must be some sort of legality preventing it.

  35. mary55geelong says

    Meghan Markle

    No, she is all about her, that’s why photos of the kids haven’t been released.

  36. omgimbackagain says

    Is this Meghan and Harry? I think she used a surrogate for both babies. I don’t follow her enough to know if she talks about her workouts and diet, though. But we all know she does have issues.

  37. KiKiKate says

    Meghan Markle?

    I guess her age is slightly against her if she needed to sort out any health issues before conceiving.

    I believe she is a narcissist and they do not make good parents. But I think Harry is a loving father so hopefully the children will be ok.

  39. JoshuaTree says

    Changing my answer to Alicia Vikander. She’s suddenly carrying a baby around everywhere and has a known addiction history.

  45. MizGrandma says

    Meghan (who was soundly criticized during pregancy #1 for frequently being photographed hand on belly, like illustration) & maybe Adderall, which not recommended during pregnancy except in very special circumstances because of a couple of different types of birth defects that may be associated with it. My question is if this might provoke a closer look at the previous birthing, if there was a long-term usage. Do I recall correctly both births being a bit squishy on timing/circumstances?

  46. SueSue says

    Meghan Markle. Heck no, I don’t think she’s a good mom. She’s a vainglorious, egomaniacal mess.

  47. gailpow says

    OMG, could this be Meghan Markle? She did want a home birth and it is said she had to do IVF to get pregnant with Archie. She might be a good mom but it is cancelled out by her being a bad person.

  49. aaatiger says

    actress: Meagan Markle

    Is she a good mother? It is a 50/50 possiblity that she is a good mother. It is also a 50% chance that she will not be a good mother. Time will tell.

  51. ILUVCA4evr says

    Well, she definitely has age going against her. The Duchess of Smug-Rachel Markle.

    Do you think she is a good mother? Nope and an even worse daughter and daughter-in-law.

  55. amagod121 says

    Meghan Markle

    Optnl: It depends. Is her dependency on prescription meds just for giggles & kicks or does she have a real, ongoing issue that she HAS to take the medicine to be or feel well? I guess her mothering ability depends upon the reason for taking it & how much she is affected by her addiction. Not the greatest idea to have a child while addicted or if the reason for having her is simply to use her for making $$$, Meghan.

    PS: Get clean for the kids’ sake.

  56. Annaliese says

    Meghan Markle. My first thought was prescription pain meds/narcotics, but I have a feeling this is alluding to a mental disorder. If so, weaning off that medicine could spell even more trouble. A mental disorder might also explain a few things that have made us ponder her behavior.

  57. JoshuaTree says

    Meghan Markle faked yet another pregnancy. Totally used a surrogate with Archie too. Only this time she didn’t have to deal with her inflating and deflating and outright falling down baby bumps.

    Even in her Oprah interview, she looked 2 months farther along in the chicken coop than in the interview.

    Terrible mother. A malignant narcissist who is merching both kids.

  60. stupidtrista says

    Markle. I have no idea if she’s a good mom but she most definitely had those children to position herself and use them as leverage. On second thought, no she’s not. A good mom wouldn’t use her children like pawns.
    I wondered why we didn’t see a million bump cradling pictures. This explains it.

  63. phoenix8209 says

    Meghan Markle. As long as the kids are healthy and happy, I’m not judging parenting abilities.

  66. Ramblingirl says

    Alicia Vikander

    I suppose I would think to be the best mother she should get clean and sober before having a child.

  67. parkland45 says

    Markle? There was talk that Archie arrived via a surrogate but now the second baby did as well?
    I have no idea what kind of mother she is but I sure am sick & tired of the numerous photos of her and her toady prince, plus the blurred photos of her baby.

  69. Skillaty says

    Meghan markle

    I don’t think she is a good mother. Those kids have a storm coming their way with her at the helm. Harry will get his karma when they write a tell all about them concerning their dysfunctional life and how they could’ve lived a life of royalty, but are in CA with an unstable mother reinventing herself every six months.

    I already know what’s shes on. I saw it years ago with her chin and inner arm scratching in interviews.

  71. uglystick says

    Megan.
    Nice pick Harry. Not.

    For outward appearances she will role play as a good mother. Behind closed doors it will be manipulation and mind games.

    Words mean little. Behavior means everything.

  75. icallitfitness says

    Harry’s first wife, Meghan Markle.
    Being a good mother is subjective and we aren’t privy to the daily life BUT I think she’s possibly far too self-centered to be a doting mother. Whether that’s considered good or not 🤷🏻‍♀️

  76. rexczarina says

    I am convinced the source for many of these Meghan Markle tips on Blind Gossip is Mother Doria. Y’all know she needs an outlet for her daughter’s embarrassing behavior.

    • marykatez says

      Interesting…and she would get paid for this too. I’m all for it. But maybe it’s also some of her “friends” who are officially over her and spilling their tea too.

  80. rc_mags says

    Meghan Markle. If this is true, she could have done so much more good in the world by being honest about her situation. Has she lied about all three pregnancies (including the miscarriage)? How sad for her child when they gets older to have this deception surrounding their birth.
    Does she make a good mother? Well, lying, deceitful, hypocritical people aren’t always the best role models for their children. Let’s just leave it at that.

  81. Sangfroid says

    Rachel Markle? I don’t remember much of her speaking of her workouts, and only avocadogate for her diet, but the rest fits! Who knows if she’s a good mother, but her self-centred outlook and need for attention (bUt AlSo PrIvAcY!!1!) does not lend itself to a good atmosphere for a young child growing up…

  84. the skeptic says

    Meghan.

    I don’t really care if she is a good mother. She wanted to have the baby NOW for her own reasons. So she used a surrogate, yeah, well. We all know that she is older than she claims to be. Fortieth birthday? Oh, please.

    That said, I hope she is focusing HER OWN EFFORTS and not those of nannies toward her children. I have a hard time believing that she’s doing that, but I do hope she is. Her husband is basically hapless.

  85. sweetshe says

    Jessica Biel?
    No idea…if she has an addiction, she’s not as good as she could be.

  86. laura1083 says

    Alicia Vikander

    She should have sorted out her issues before bringing a baby into the world.

  88. gingerbread says

    I feel like this is Meghan Markle. If she did indeed use a surrogate the baby is not eligible for the line of succession to the throne. Maybe that’s why it took them so long to update the website with the line? Interesting…

    • HistFicAuthor says

      Why is everyone assuming that “surrogate” means “not Meghan and Harry’s biological child”? As long as it was her egg and his sperm, it doesn’t matter who gave birth to the kid. It’s still genetically theirs.

    • Daisy128 says

      HistFicAuthor says – It’s not about genetics, it’s about british law, children born by surrogate can’t hold titles and be placed in the line of succesion, so even if this baby is their biological child, if she was born via surroagte she can’t be in the line of succesion, it must be born “of her(Meg’s) body”!