BLIND GOSSIP

The #1 Blind Item Site in the World!

London Dine And Dash

[Pop Bitch] Which famous sportsman’s kid realised they’d left their wallet at home when the bill came at a trendy London pub – so decided to do a rather fast runner?

BG Note: Do a runner = skip out on the bill/dine and dash.

Similar: The Big Vegas Stiff

Athlete/Child:

[Optional] If a child commits some sort of crime, should the parents be held responsible?

Reader Interactions

Comments

  2. Brooklyn Beckham

    If they are over the age of criminal responsibility then it is the kid who is accountable

  3. Probably one of the Beckham kids.

    I think parents should be required to sign off on some disciplinary strategy – community service, a strict curfew, suspended driving privileges, incarceration in more extreme circumstances, and things like that. If the parent refuses to sign off or is found to not be enforcing the disciplinary strategy, then the parent should be held accountable. That way, parents HAVE to teach children there are consequences for their actions.

    • David SHOULD go back and pay for the tab. Working class blokes stiffed by his obnoxious rich kid, gross. I’d make the kid go back with the cash and an apology. Brooklyn needs a wake up call. Total brat . David would be doing him a favor making him humble himself. And its not like they (Posh and Becks) CAN’T because he is over 18 since I’m sure they pay for everything in his life.

  5. This has to be Brooklyn Beckham. I thought Rocco Richie for a minute coz that pic looks like his dad’s pub but nah, this is 100% Brooklyn.

  7. David Beckhams son Brooklyn Beckham

    Optional: If it was Brooklyn then he is over 18 and therefore considered an adult. His parents aren’t responsible for his crime.

  8. Doesn’t say when but I’ll say Brooklyn Beckham.. son of David “Bend it like Beckham”

    If underage- yes. Either way the folks should pay up to do the right thing.

  11. Clearly a Beckham.
    No, the parent should not be held responsible, but I still might push the parent to give the kid a kick in the butt. What an embarrassment!

  14. oh it has to be one of those beckham boys – hope he has the decency to go back and pay or at least mail it in with a nice tip for his server

  15. That would be David Beckhams son Brooklin!

    No! The child should be responsible as I believe he’s over 18! Under 18 then yes but once they get to 18 it should be the child that gets in trouble

  17. Brooklyn Beckham

    Optional- the brats need their ass whipped in the public square for embarrassment

  18. Presumably the kid was over the age of 18 if he was drinking in a pub without his parents. So I’ll guess Brooklyn Beckham, who is 19.

  19. Athlete: David Beckham

    No parents should not be held responsible if their child commits a crime. This Beckham “kid” is an adult but even if he wasn’t he’s the one that broke the law, so he should face the consequences.

  27. David Beckham

    Parents shouldn’t be held responsible for the crimes of their children… and why couldn’t he just call someone to bring him his wallet or some money?

  28. So they didn’t come back and pay? If they were famous, I’m sure they would be allowed to.
    Probably Beckham. They seem dumb enough.

  38. Unsure on the child.

    A parent should be at least partly responsible if the child is under the age of legal responsibility. However I doubt this child was under that age.

  42. David Beckham
    Spoiled Beckham Brat

    If the kid is still living with the parents they’re responsible for the fruit of their loins. Pay up.

  47. My guess is Brooklyn Beckham. It just goes to show that you can have all the money in the world but that can never teach you to be a decent human being. How sad.