SOLVED!
[Blind Gossip] While everyone is up in arms about how to deal with a couple of members of this famous family who are seemingly beyond their control, an insider provides a glimpse as to exactly how it happened.
She was quite cunning. She talked to him about his mother all the time. She used the pain he felt about losing his mother to make him rely on her and to turn him against everyone else in his family.
She told him that he is actually “a wounded little boy” and that his family was wrong for making him act stoically. She also told him that he should never forget how terribly his family treated his mother.
She encouraged him to talk about his feelings and told him the more he lets the sadness and anger out both privately and in public, the sooner his pain would heal. He cried with her and she comforted him like his mother would.
She told him that once he was able to choose for himself and act independently from his family, they would fulfill his mother’s legacy together.
This does explain his recent surge in discussing his feelings in public… his newfound temper… as well as his alienation from his family.
But did he simply trade one controlling entity for another?
Similar: Too Cute Love
Couple:
His Mother:
[Optional] Do you think his mother would have approved of her? Why or why not? Please use people’s real names.
SOLVED!
Couple: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
His Mother: Princess Diana
Who told you weeks ago that Meghan Markle told Prince Harry that he is “wounded” and that he needs to be “healed”?
Your friends at Blind Gossip, that’s who!
Yes, we are very fortunate to have such good sources.
And guess what? He is not the only one to whom Meghan Markle is communicating that EXACT same message!
From Metro:
Meghan Markle says “We’re all wounded creatures that need to be healed” in bakery visit
Meghan Markle said that humans are not ‘mechanical objects that need to be fixed’, while visiting the Luminary Bakery’s Camden Branch.
The 38-year-old joined in the session with disadvantaged women and listened to a number of stories about drug abuse, homelessness and being in prison, The Daily Telegraph reported.
She lamented a ‘culture of instant gratification’ where people want an ‘instant fix’, saying humans must instead be seen as ‘wounded creatures that need to be healed’.
The Duchess, who has been a vocal mental health advocate, previously highlighted the project when she guest-edited an issue of British Vogue.
Speaking to Tanya, a woman who was stabbed repeatedly by a violent ex-partner, Meghan said: ‘We get into this habit of wanting things done immediately nowadays. There’s a culture of instant gratification, of the instant fix. ‘But we aren’t mechanical objects that need to be fixed. You’re a wounded creature that needs to be healed, and that takes time.’
Frankly, Meghan Markle’s messaging gives us whiplash.
You are strong… because you are wounded! I’m hopping on another private jet… because I care about the environment! I’m wearing this $13,000 Givency dress… because instant gratification is bad for you!
Now she is supporting mental health causes… while her own husband seems to be having a mental breakdown!
You can’t deny that Prince Harry has changed dramatically since he has been with her. Harry seems to become weaker and unhappier and angrier and more estranged from his family and friends with every passing month.
Is this part of the healing process to recover from the passing of Princess Diana more than twenty years ago? Or is this the way Meghan Markle manipulates him? Is she convincing him that he is wounded… and that she is the solution to heal him?
It remains to be seen how this will all turn out.
Congratulations to Willowtree for being first with the correct response!
Scrappys says
Meghan knows best when it comes to healing and family, I mean, just look at how amazing she is with her dad and siblings! Roflmao! Harry should have gotten a clue when she played the victim with him, but instead he welcomed her narcissistic pathological behaviour into his life. He will lose his family and when he finally wakes up it will be hard to mend those fences. For the sake of his child, I hope he wakes up faster.
Whisper says
Yes healing isnt the same as a quick fix. Yes people are too immediate-gratification oriented. Yes she wears expensive clothes and agrees to fly in private jets. But in this family, jets are a given, I imagine she could cut back on clothing expense. Yes also to the fact she must have had some idea of the royals rigid ways. If there’s evidence Harry is emotionally collapsing, that’s bad. And yes again- if they didn’t want to stay with the Royals, they could leave. Diana did.
beepbeep81 says
I know she has come off as a bit eager to shake up the RF (I would be, too) but if she is so bent on using their resources for her own gain, why would she simultaneously be trying to get Harry to distance himself or even possibly break away completely?
Alexis_Rose says
We had this happen in our family where someone swooped in on our daughter at a vulnerable time & slowly but surely began isolating her from family & friends. It took a number of years, but finally the spell was broken & the relationship ended. My daughter looks back on that time & says about herself, “I don’t know who that person was.” It’s very scary for the family & it’s a very real thing that happens.
Ramblingirl says
I’ve seen the same. They are very territorial and it’s understandable. They’ve had to fight to hold on to anything and anyone. They get the loved one to themselves…make them prove their allegiance…it’s us versus them.
Beachbum says
I agree completely. They were foolish to use a PR firm from the US that doesn’t understand British culture. I don’t doubt that Harry has issues; if so , he needs a professional to counsel him, not his wife. Diana would be heartbroken to see her boys at odds.
Acheronbeach says
I think Diana and Meghan would’ve hated each other. Diana was beautiful and caring but severely mentally ill and used media attention to help her low self esteem. Diana also focused her charity work on people who seemed ugly, poor and sick. Meghan also seems to court media attention. Her public work focuses a lot on businesses who have charity components and celebs.
I don’t think Diana would have liked sharing the spotlight. I don’t think she would’ve liked M’s approach to…
ChattyCat says
What do you mean by *real deal* (about the monarchy)? Diana was considered a misfit by the royal family because she wouldn’t conform to their antiquated sexist ways. I think the problem with Meghan *and any thinking woman of today* is that the monarchy world is stuck in the 17th century. I think this is what Meghan was eluding to in the recent interview when she expressed being naive about the world she was stepping into. Regardless of popular opinion I like her.
Acheronbeach says
Xela, if he’s truly struggling and wounded, alienating his family and playing his struggles out on a public stage can’t be helpful or healing. It’s actually really concerning and demonstrates that her need for attention outweighs her husband’s mental health needs.
Harry and Meghan absolutely could renounce public royal life of he wanted or needed to. It’s been done before. He could focus on his own health in relative privacy and wealth. But they don’t. It’s worrying.
High Steppa says
All I can say is that this would break Diana’s heart to see the schism that has developed between her sons. Meghan may be right about talking about your feelings but I have an awful feeling that she has an agenda to benefit herself.
timesink says
She sure went for the instant gratification of power & prestige rather than running in the opposite direction from a family who murdered the better loved daughter in law.
winteriscoming says
100%!! She is a user and Harry is stupid enough to let her! She is going to use those kids to keep Harry in line and to further his breach with his brother. She will not be happy until they live in Hollywood…. she and her broken prince, Until he mans up and becomes the man his mom would of wanted.
mybellyistoofulltothink says
spot on! INFANTILIZING is the word for this situation. He always looks uncomfortable now in public and wait for her to make the next move. I couldn’t think of the word until I read your post haha “wounded child”. Man I feel bad for anyone foolish enough to fall for her act.
Sleepyandconfused says
Xela, in my opinion if he doesn’t want to take the royal responsibilities he should be stripped of his title (along with his wife) and only use the inheritance money.
Move away from the royal properties (paid by tax payers) and live his life not on tax payers tab.
After that, he can do what he wants.
But they both use their royal privileges, use the tax payers money, while not following the royal rules, and they keep complaining that they are the victims?!
I have no sympathy for them
aaaAnonny says
Holy sh*t, Blindgossip really hit the nail on the head with the “wounded” quote. This is eery.
montrealaise says
If nothing else, the timing of their interviews in the documentary sucks. What have they accomplished? 1. Drew attention away from their trip to Africa and the work they did there. 2. Drew attention away from William and Catherine’s historic trip to Pakistan. 3. Drew attention away from Charles’ trip to Japan. 4. Drew a lot of attention for themselves – some positive, some negative. Did they even think about the consequences?
zappy2050 says
The problem is that Meghan is being selfish and has an agenda – instead of genuinely trying to help Harry. Helping Harry would include laying low and trying to get along. Instead she is trying to seem revolutionary. My prediction is they will get rid of her. I have my own ideas of how they will get rid of her, but I won’t say it on this site. I am sure there are plans underway as I type to get rid of her.
OhYeah says
It is entire possible (and completely likely) to dislike or disagree with someone for reasons other than jealousy. Personally, I’m very happy with my life/life choices and I have no reason to be jealous of her; I dislike her for being a scheming, shallow social climber.
ghostrider44 says
I have seen people who are estranged from their family create drama so their spouse or partner becomes estranged from their family too. I think it’s a way of trying to alienate the partner so they don’t lose them too. However over time it can backfire. I think this is what Megan has done to Harry.
AHHAof3 says
Drew12345, I really like your comment. Good insight.
AHHAof3 says
With my background in marriage and family counseling, I can say that what she said in her speech was mostly correct. Whether she’s altruistic or disingenuous, I can’t say for sure, but there’s nothing wrong with her speech. Not sure if she’s just being manipulative, BUT if becoming a father has brought a lot of old wounds to the surface in Harry, it wouldn’t surprise me: that happens quite often (sometimes as soon as a baby is born, sometimes when the child is a bit older). So who knows? Not me.
montrealaise says
The fact that she has alienated him from his entire family – particularly his brother and sister-in-law, whom he was close to – is very troubling. People who have their spouse’s best interests at heart don’t do that.
fiddlesticks says
yes, that’s exactly it. MM inserts herself into the public gaze and inflicts her opinions on that same public without caring a jot about them. Plus he’s been quite ruthless with family and friends as she’s clawed her way up. I don’t see her show one ounce of caring or compassion for anyone, any creature, any cause without her gaining something from it.
ItsBouquet says
Xela we must have different definitions of “strong.” True strength is taking the higher road even if you badly want to bite back. I see her as always biting back through “anonymous friends,” a televised interview, and now a lawsuit. The Cambridges have demonstrated true strength. They kept their dignified silence, through years of criticism. Not that it’ss right to constantly face criticism, but the two different reactions between the Cambridges and Sussex’s show which pair is really…
ItsBouquet says
Willowtree, I agree. I was surprised to see it as solved. I don’t think Meghan is divisive, I think the great majority see right through her including her own brother-in-law.
At this point, because they have child together, I’m hoping she calms down and out of the spotlight, rather than get divorced.
willowtree says
It’s interesting to read BG’s take on MM, she definitely is very divisive. I never thought I’d be first as these blinds aren’t usually listed as “solved”
OhYeah says
I don’t think she’s “feminizing” him (which shouldn’t be considered an insult, BTW). Rather, she’s infantilizing him – treating him like a baby/small child and she’s the mother with all the power to comfort him and control his life. (i.e., calling him a “wounded child”)
Drew12345 says
I am torn about this. I do see some of the things Harry and Meghan are doing as manipulative and hypocritical. You can’t pick and choose when you want to use the media for sympathy/good PR and then also criticize them. I guess you can try lol however mental health is very serious and I think Harry (or anyone) should be allowed to have boundaries and work through deeply rooted issues. I hope a professional therapist is involved. Is it unreasonable that he has emotions and feelings that need attn?
charlene2345 says
Okay, but let’s play devil’s advocate here for a moment. They don’t like being “under control” of the RF…. yet they are perfectly happy utilizing all of the resources the RF has to offer, are they not???
charlene2345 says
I have read several times that Harry is not particularly bright and is a follower, not a leader. It wouldn’t be very hard for him to be manipulated by someone.
KendraATL says
Narcissists are pros at reading people and using their vulnerabilities to manipulate emotions. Meghan was well aware of Harry’s wounds even before they met after stalking her way into his social circle. As a profoundly narcissistic personality type, it’s to her advantage to reopen Harry’s emotional wounds and keep them open and raw. So much easier to exploit and manipulate him via his dead mother in order to move her agenda forward to enhance ‘Brand Sussex,’ which pre-Harry was ‘Brand Meghan.’
silimom says
They are the Wallis Simpson/Duchess of Windsor and Edward VIII/Duke of Windsor of this generation. Harry, if you alienate your family, your father or brother will remove you from the Civil List of paid, working royals. You’ll be given an allowance but nowhere near enough to realize your mother’s legacy or satisfy your wife. Unlike Wallis, she will then divorce you, demanding and receiving a large settlement and child support for the two children you will have, take the kids and leave.
EllaKos says
So WRONG to use platform of Royal Tour of Duty in Africa, of all places!!, as a stage to vent own personal war on RF and the Media, Convenient if one considers the Markles are presently focussed on suing certain tabloids. However very DISTASTEFUL, UNNECESSARY AND UNKIND especially to the deprived African people who truly struggle and NEED a VOICE !! Lack of empathy and poor judgement. Narcissism indeed!
EllaKos says
Poor judgement, lack of empathy and deeply offensive for the Markles to turn a Royal Tour of
EllaKos says
Now Will’s has expressed concern for fragile brother Megan will be keen ppint out H it’s a sign of strength to be true to feelings. However wrong time Wrong place!! As a tax payer + humanitarian , re; African royal tour of dutyHarry+Megan so selfish, ungrateful and frankly extremely DISTASTEFUL to focus on SELF with all their riches and means of disposal, And NOT poverty, inequality and mental challenges people daily struggle with on
jacksonian says
Good riddance.
jacksonian says
LOL. Yes, but she is entertaining.
SecretBountyHunter says
I agree that Harry is emboldened now. I think Diana sent her from up above to rattle the Royal Family a bit; and for that reason, Diana would LOVE MEGHAN. Classy, Smart, Beautiful, Friendly, and loves giving back and reminds the world of the power of diversity – which only strengthens her message to multiple audiences. You couldn’t get a better ambassador. A terrific addition to the family. If only there wasn’t jealousy from that sister-in-law..
Alexis_Rose says
I think she’s disingenuous pretending not to know the British tabloids are difficult (um, who is Harry blaming for his mother’s death? ) and how we don’t have that here in the U.S. . . . Excuse me? This country is full of tabloid news, gossip columns, magazines, and the like. Her “babe in the woods” routine is what makes me dislike and distrust her.
Alexis_Rose says
I am very sorry for your loss. : (
Yoyowoman says
He has more scrutiny in his life because he’s a Royal – it comes with the job. If they like it, they can leave.
Diana had hassle from the press but also used them to get her message out when it suited her, same as these two are doing.
Lastly, she died because she was driven by a drunk driver and for whatever reason decided not to wear her seatbelt. In short, the press may have contributed to the circumstances leading up to the crash, but they didn’t kill her. Her poor decisions did that.
DrDeezer says
Willowtree, agree with you 100%. This is indeed a manipulation and the first thing a master manipulator will do is cut you off from everyone you’ve known and loved so that the manipulator can be the central focus of your life. This is not about fulfilling Diana’s legacy
ChattyCat says
I think Diana and Meghan would become great friends. After all her son loved her enough to marry her and chose her to be the mother of his children. I don’t like the outdated monarchy system BUT I believe people should keep out of other’s marriages. Harry chose her as his wife. It’s no one elses business (beyond his immediate family).
ChattyCat says
Exactly! People tear Meghan down as if thety know her or have personal insight into their marriage. To me it seems like a case of self-fulfilling prophesy: the poor woman is perceived as attention seeking bc she’s standing up for herself against those who’ve decided she’s brainwashed Harry. Maybe…just maybe…Harry knows Megz more than a bunch of hating strangers do and is standing by her because he loves her.
august2019 says
When they insinuate things about the RF and speak out against them publicly it’s more than going against family; it is actually like speaking out against your boss. The Queen is more a boss figure to Harry than a Grandmother. They are the ones breaking from protocol and not following the playbook. I see it as being openly divisive and insubordinate.